Searched hist:10231 (Results 1 - 15 of 15) sorted by relevance
| /gem5/src/base/ | ||
| H A D | match.cc | diff 10231:cb2e6950956d Sat May 31 21:00:00 EDT 2014 Steve Reinhardt <steve.reinhardt@amd.com> style: eliminate equality tests with true and false Using '== true' in a boolean expression is totally redundant, and using '== false' is pretty verbose (and arguably less readable in most cases) compared to '!'. It's somewhat of a pet peeve, perhaps, but I had some time waiting for some tests to run and decided to clean these up. Unfortunately, SLICC appears not to have the '!' operator, so I had to leave the '== false' tests in the SLICC code. |
| /gem5/src/mem/slicc/ast/ | ||
| H A D | PeekStatementAST.py | diff 10231:cb2e6950956d Sat May 31 21:00:00 EDT 2014 Steve Reinhardt <steve.reinhardt@amd.com> style: eliminate equality tests with true and false Using '== true' in a boolean expression is totally redundant, and using '== false' is pretty verbose (and arguably less readable in most cases) compared to '!'. It's somewhat of a pet peeve, perhaps, but I had some time waiting for some tests to run and decided to clean these up. Unfortunately, SLICC appears not to have the '!' operator, so I had to leave the '== false' tests in the SLICC code. |
| /gem5/src/base/loader/ | ||
| H A D | hex_file.cc | diff 10231:cb2e6950956d Sat May 31 21:00:00 EDT 2014 Steve Reinhardt <steve.reinhardt@amd.com> style: eliminate equality tests with true and false Using '== true' in a boolean expression is totally redundant, and using '== false' is pretty verbose (and arguably less readable in most cases) compared to '!'. It's somewhat of a pet peeve, perhaps, but I had some time waiting for some tests to run and decided to clean these up. Unfortunately, SLICC appears not to have the '!' operator, so I had to leave the '== false' tests in the SLICC code. |
| /gem5/src/arch/power/ | ||
| H A D | tlb.cc | diff 10231:cb2e6950956d Sat May 31 21:00:00 EDT 2014 Steve Reinhardt <steve.reinhardt@amd.com> style: eliminate equality tests with true and false Using '== true' in a boolean expression is totally redundant, and using '== false' is pretty verbose (and arguably less readable in most cases) compared to '!'. It's somewhat of a pet peeve, perhaps, but I had some time waiting for some tests to run and decided to clean these up. Unfortunately, SLICC appears not to have the '!' operator, so I had to leave the '== false' tests in the SLICC code. |
| /gem5/src/arch/mips/ | ||
| H A D | tlb.cc | diff 10231:cb2e6950956d Sat May 31 21:00:00 EDT 2014 Steve Reinhardt <steve.reinhardt@amd.com> style: eliminate equality tests with true and false Using '== true' in a boolean expression is totally redundant, and using '== false' is pretty verbose (and arguably less readable in most cases) compared to '!'. It's somewhat of a pet peeve, perhaps, but I had some time waiting for some tests to run and decided to clean these up. Unfortunately, SLICC appears not to have the '!' operator, so I had to leave the '== false' tests in the SLICC code. |
| /gem5/src/cpu/o3/ | ||
| H A D | rob_impl.hh | diff 10231:cb2e6950956d Sat May 31 21:00:00 EDT 2014 Steve Reinhardt <steve.reinhardt@amd.com> style: eliminate equality tests with true and false Using '== true' in a boolean expression is totally redundant, and using '== false' is pretty verbose (and arguably less readable in most cases) compared to '!'. It's somewhat of a pet peeve, perhaps, but I had some time waiting for some tests to run and decided to clean these up. Unfortunately, SLICC appears not to have the '!' operator, so I had to leave the '== false' tests in the SLICC code. |
| H A D | inst_queue_impl.hh | diff 10231:cb2e6950956d Sat May 31 21:00:00 EDT 2014 Steve Reinhardt <steve.reinhardt@amd.com> style: eliminate equality tests with true and false Using '== true' in a boolean expression is totally redundant, and using '== false' is pretty verbose (and arguably less readable in most cases) compared to '!'. It's somewhat of a pet peeve, perhaps, but I had some time waiting for some tests to run and decided to clean these up. Unfortunately, SLICC appears not to have the '!' operator, so I had to leave the '== false' tests in the SLICC code. |
| H A D | iew_impl.hh | diff 10231:cb2e6950956d Sat May 31 21:00:00 EDT 2014 Steve Reinhardt <steve.reinhardt@amd.com> style: eliminate equality tests with true and false Using '== true' in a boolean expression is totally redundant, and using '== false' is pretty verbose (and arguably less readable in most cases) compared to '!'. It's somewhat of a pet peeve, perhaps, but I had some time waiting for some tests to run and decided to clean these up. Unfortunately, SLICC appears not to have the '!' operator, so I had to leave the '== false' tests in the SLICC code. |
| H A D | commit_impl.hh | diff 10231:cb2e6950956d Sat May 31 21:00:00 EDT 2014 Steve Reinhardt <steve.reinhardt@amd.com> style: eliminate equality tests with true and false Using '== true' in a boolean expression is totally redundant, and using '== false' is pretty verbose (and arguably less readable in most cases) compared to '!'. It's somewhat of a pet peeve, perhaps, but I had some time waiting for some tests to run and decided to clean these up. Unfortunately, SLICC appears not to have the '!' operator, so I had to leave the '== false' tests in the SLICC code. |
| H A D | lsq_unit_impl.hh | diff 10231:cb2e6950956d Sat May 31 21:00:00 EDT 2014 Steve Reinhardt <steve.reinhardt@amd.com> style: eliminate equality tests with true and false Using '== true' in a boolean expression is totally redundant, and using '== false' is pretty verbose (and arguably less readable in most cases) compared to '!'. It's somewhat of a pet peeve, perhaps, but I had some time waiting for some tests to run and decided to clean these up. Unfortunately, SLICC appears not to have the '!' operator, so I had to leave the '== false' tests in the SLICC code. |
| H A D | fetch_impl.hh | diff 10231:cb2e6950956d Sat May 31 21:00:00 EDT 2014 Steve Reinhardt <steve.reinhardt@amd.com> style: eliminate equality tests with true and false Using '== true' in a boolean expression is totally redundant, and using '== false' is pretty verbose (and arguably less readable in most cases) compared to '!'. It's somewhat of a pet peeve, perhaps, but I had some time waiting for some tests to run and decided to clean these up. Unfortunately, SLICC appears not to have the '!' operator, so I had to leave the '== false' tests in the SLICC code. |
| /gem5/src/arch/x86/ | ||
| H A D | pagetable_walker.cc | diff 10231:cb2e6950956d Sat May 31 21:00:00 EDT 2014 Steve Reinhardt <steve.reinhardt@amd.com> style: eliminate equality tests with true and false Using '== true' in a boolean expression is totally redundant, and using '== false' is pretty verbose (and arguably less readable in most cases) compared to '!'. It's somewhat of a pet peeve, perhaps, but I had some time waiting for some tests to run and decided to clean these up. Unfortunately, SLICC appears not to have the '!' operator, so I had to leave the '== false' tests in the SLICC code. |
| /gem5/src/mem/ruby/system/ | ||
| H A D | DMASequencer.cc | diff 10231:cb2e6950956d Sat May 31 21:00:00 EDT 2014 Steve Reinhardt <steve.reinhardt@amd.com> style: eliminate equality tests with true and false Using '== true' in a boolean expression is totally redundant, and using '== false' is pretty verbose (and arguably less readable in most cases) compared to '!'. It's somewhat of a pet peeve, perhaps, but I had some time waiting for some tests to run and decided to clean these up. Unfortunately, SLICC appears not to have the '!' operator, so I had to leave the '== false' tests in the SLICC code. |
| /gem5/src/cpu/ | ||
| H A D | exetrace.cc | diff 10231:cb2e6950956d Sat May 31 21:00:00 EDT 2014 Steve Reinhardt <steve.reinhardt@amd.com> style: eliminate equality tests with true and false Using '== true' in a boolean expression is totally redundant, and using '== false' is pretty verbose (and arguably less readable in most cases) compared to '!'. It's somewhat of a pet peeve, perhaps, but I had some time waiting for some tests to run and decided to clean these up. Unfortunately, SLICC appears not to have the '!' operator, so I had to leave the '== false' tests in the SLICC code. |
| /gem5/src/arch/sparc/ | ||
| H A D | tlb.cc | diff 10231:cb2e6950956d Sat May 31 21:00:00 EDT 2014 Steve Reinhardt <steve.reinhardt@amd.com> style: eliminate equality tests with true and false Using '== true' in a boolean expression is totally redundant, and using '== false' is pretty verbose (and arguably less readable in most cases) compared to '!'. It's somewhat of a pet peeve, perhaps, but I had some time waiting for some tests to run and decided to clean these up. Unfortunately, SLICC appears not to have the '!' operator, so I had to leave the '== false' tests in the SLICC code. |
Completed in 275 milliseconds