Searched hist:10314 (Results 1 - 11 of 11) sorted by relevance

/gem5/src/mem/ruby/structures/
H A DPseudoLRUPolicy.hh10314:94b6b28fc968 Mon Sep 01 17:55:00 EDT 2014 Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> ruby: remove typedef of Index as int64
The Index type defined as typedef int64 does not really provide any help
since in most places we use primitive types instead of Index. Also, the name
Index is very generic that it does not merit being used as a typename.
H A DLRUPolicy.hh10314:94b6b28fc968 Mon Sep 01 17:55:00 EDT 2014 Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> ruby: remove typedef of Index as int64
The Index type defined as typedef int64 does not really provide any help
since in most places we use primitive types instead of Index. Also, the name
Index is very generic that it does not merit being used as a typename.
H A DAbstractReplacementPolicy.hh10314:94b6b28fc968 Mon Sep 01 17:55:00 EDT 2014 Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> ruby: remove typedef of Index as int64
The Index type defined as typedef int64 does not really provide any help
since in most places we use primitive types instead of Index. Also, the name
Index is very generic that it does not merit being used as a typename.
H A DBankedArray.hh10314:94b6b28fc968 Mon Sep 01 17:55:00 EDT 2014 Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> ruby: remove typedef of Index as int64
The Index type defined as typedef int64 does not really provide any help
since in most places we use primitive types instead of Index. Also, the name
Index is very generic that it does not merit being used as a typename.
H A DBankedArray.cc10314:94b6b28fc968 Mon Sep 01 17:55:00 EDT 2014 Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> ruby: remove typedef of Index as int64
The Index type defined as typedef int64 does not really provide any help
since in most places we use primitive types instead of Index. Also, the name
Index is very generic that it does not merit being used as a typename.
H A DDirectoryMemory.cc10314:94b6b28fc968 Mon Sep 01 17:55:00 EDT 2014 Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> ruby: remove typedef of Index as int64
The Index type defined as typedef int64 does not really provide any help
since in most places we use primitive types instead of Index. Also, the name
Index is very generic that it does not merit being used as a typename.
H A DCacheMemory.hh10314:94b6b28fc968 Mon Sep 01 17:55:00 EDT 2014 Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> ruby: remove typedef of Index as int64
The Index type defined as typedef int64 does not really provide any help
since in most places we use primitive types instead of Index. Also, the name
Index is very generic that it does not merit being used as a typename.
H A DCacheMemory.cc10314:94b6b28fc968 Mon Sep 01 17:55:00 EDT 2014 Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> ruby: remove typedef of Index as int64
The Index type defined as typedef int64 does not really provide any help
since in most places we use primitive types instead of Index. Also, the name
Index is very generic that it does not merit being used as a typename.
/gem5/src/mem/ruby/common/
H A DAddress.cc10314:94b6b28fc968 Mon Sep 01 17:55:00 EDT 2014 Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> ruby: remove typedef of Index as int64
The Index type defined as typedef int64 does not really provide any help
since in most places we use primitive types instead of Index. Also, the name
Index is very generic that it does not merit being used as a typename.
H A DTypeDefines.hh10314:94b6b28fc968 Mon Sep 01 17:55:00 EDT 2014 Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> ruby: remove typedef of Index as int64
The Index type defined as typedef int64 does not really provide any help
since in most places we use primitive types instead of Index. Also, the name
Index is very generic that it does not merit being used as a typename.
H A DAddress.hh10314:94b6b28fc968 Mon Sep 01 17:55:00 EDT 2014 Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> ruby: remove typedef of Index as int64
The Index type defined as typedef int64 does not really provide any help
since in most places we use primitive types instead of Index. Also, the name
Index is very generic that it does not merit being used as a typename.

Completed in 47 milliseconds