Revert "mem-cache: Remove writebacks packet list"

This reverts commit bf0a722acdd8247602e83720a5f81a0b69c76250.

Reason for revert: This patch introduces a bug:

The problem here is that the insertion of block A may cause the
eviction of block B, which on the lower level may cause the
eviction of block A. Since A is not marked as present yet, A is
"safely" removed from the snoop filter

However, by reverting it, using atomic and a Tags sub-class that
can generate multiple evictions at once becomes broken when using
Atomic mode and shall be fixed in a future patch.

Change-Id: I5b27e54b54ae5b50255588835c1a2ebf3015f002
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/19088
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>

mem-cache: Remove writebacks packet list

Previously all atomic writebacks concerned a single block,
therefore, when a block was evicted, no other block would be
pending eviction. With sector tags (and compression),
however, a single replacement can generate many evictions.

This can cause problems, since a writeback that evicts a block
may evict blocks in the lower cache. If one of these conflict
with one of the blocks pending eviction in the higher level, the
snoop must inform it to the lower level. Since atomic mode does
not have a writebuffer, this kind of conflict wouldn't be noticed.

Therefore, instead of evicting multiple blocks at once, we
do it one by one.

Change-Id: I2fc2f9eb0f26248ddf91adbe987d158f5a2e592b
Signed-off-by: Daniel R. Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18209
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>

mem-cache: Remove writebacks parameter from serviceMSHRTargets

Change 8ba77ae8fc98a355082da2bd9fdc6ecf4928f725 introduced the
writebacks parameter, but it was never used.

Change-Id: I225e5b399de42d77c72fc0012d3dc93ef39b8853
Signed-off-by: Daniel R. Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/14896
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>

mem-cache: Move evictBlock(CacheBlk*, PacketList&) to base

Move evictBlock(CacheBlk*, PacketList&) to base cache,
as it is both sub-classes implementations are equal.

Change-Id: I80fbd16813bfcc4938fb01ed76abe29b3f8b3018
Signed-off-by: Daniel R. Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13656
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>

mem: Restructure whole-line writes to simplify write merging

This patch changes how we deal with whole-line writes their
responses. With these changes, we use the MSHR tracking to determine
if a whole-line is written, and on a fill we simply handle the
invalidation response, with the actual writes taking place as part of
satisfying the CPU-side hit.

Change-Id: I9a18e41a95db3c20b97f8bca7d95ff33d35a578b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/12905
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>

mem-cache: Fix bug in handleAtomicReqMiss

"4976ff5 mem-cache: Refactor the recvAtomic function" introduced a bug
where if an atomic request that fills in using the tempBlock it will
not evict it when it finishes handling the request as it should. This
triggers an assertion. This change fixes this bug.

Change-Id: I73c808a7e15237eddb36b5448ef6728f7bcf7fd9
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12644
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>

mem-cache: Add a non-coherent cache

The class re-uses the existing MSHR and write queue. At the moment
every single access is handled by the cache, even uncacheable
accesses, and nothing is forwarded.

This is a modified version of a changeset put together by Andreas
Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com>

Change-Id: I41f7f9c2b8c7fa5ec23712a4446e8adb1c9a336a
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/8291
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>