Searched hist:9162 (Results 1 - 11 of 11) sorted by relevance

/gem5/src/dev/x86/
H A DPcSpeaker.py9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter

This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both
redundant, and possibly incorrect.

The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a
Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency
to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that
it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case.
H A DI8237.py9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter

This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both
redundant, and possibly incorrect.

The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a
Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency
to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that
it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case.
H A DI8259.py9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter

This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both
redundant, and possibly incorrect.

The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a
Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency
to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that
it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case.
H A DCmos.py9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter

This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both
redundant, and possibly incorrect.

The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a
Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency
to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that
it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case.
H A DI8254.py9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter

This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both
redundant, and possibly incorrect.

The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a
Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency
to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that
it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case.
H A DI82094AA.py9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter

This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both
redundant, and possibly incorrect.

The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a
Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency
to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that
it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case.
H A DI8042.py9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter

This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both
redundant, and possibly incorrect.

The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a
Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency
to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that
it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case.
H A DSouthBridge.py9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter

This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both
redundant, and possibly incorrect.

The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a
Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency
to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that
it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case.
/gem5/src/dev/sparc/
H A DT1000.py9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter

This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both
redundant, and possibly incorrect.

The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a
Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency
to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that
it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case.
/gem5/src/arch/x86/
H A DX86LocalApic.py9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter

This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both
redundant, and possibly incorrect.

The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a
Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency
to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that
it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case.
/gem5/src/dev/
H A DDevice.py9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter

This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both
redundant, and possibly incorrect.

The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a
Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency
to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that
it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case.

Completed in 42 milliseconds