Searched hist:9162 (Results 1 - 11 of 11) sorted by relevance
/gem5/src/dev/x86/ | ||
H A D | PcSpeaker.py | 9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both redundant, and possibly incorrect. The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case. |
H A D | I8237.py | 9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both redundant, and possibly incorrect. The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case. |
H A D | I8259.py | 9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both redundant, and possibly incorrect. The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case. |
H A D | Cmos.py | 9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both redundant, and possibly incorrect. The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case. |
H A D | I8254.py | 9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both redundant, and possibly incorrect. The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case. |
H A D | I82094AA.py | 9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both redundant, and possibly incorrect. The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case. |
H A D | I8042.py | 9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both redundant, and possibly incorrect. The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case. |
H A D | SouthBridge.py | 9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both redundant, and possibly incorrect. The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case. |
/gem5/src/dev/sparc/ | ||
H A D | T1000.py | 9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both redundant, and possibly incorrect. The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case. |
/gem5/src/arch/x86/ | ||
H A D | X86LocalApic.py | 9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both redundant, and possibly incorrect. The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case. |
/gem5/src/dev/ | ||
H A D | Device.py | 9162:019047ead23b Tue Aug 21 05:50:00 EDT 2012 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> Device: Remove overloaded pio_latency parameter This patch removes the overloading of the parameter, which seems both redundant, and possibly incorrect. The PciConfigAll now also uses a Param.Latency rather than a Param.Tick. For backwards compatibility it still sets the pio_latency to 1 tick. All the comments have also been updated to not state that it is in simticks when it is not necessarily the case. |
Completed in 42 milliseconds