Searched hist:14118 (Results 1 - 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /gem5/src/mem/cache/ | ||
| H A D | cache.cc | diff 14118:3d2ee7721eb0 Mon Jul 29 14:45:00 EDT 2019 Tiago Mück <tiago.muck@arm.com> mem-cache: mark block as dirty when handling SW prefetch This addresses the issue described in 64687ee mem-cache: Mark block as dirty after a SWPrefetchEXResp. Previous patch misses cases when the prefetch response is ReadExResp or UpgradeResp. Also, marking the block as dirty in serviceMSHRTargets instead of in handleFill covers cases when the prefetch is coalesced with other requests. Change-Id: I2b377fdd240eb0f09e720b6bb284dee6545925ce Signed-off-by: Tiago Mück <tiago.muck@arm.com> Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/19688 Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br> Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
| H A D | base.cc | diff 14118:3d2ee7721eb0 Mon Jul 29 14:45:00 EDT 2019 Tiago Mück <tiago.muck@arm.com> mem-cache: mark block as dirty when handling SW prefetch This addresses the issue described in 64687ee mem-cache: Mark block as dirty after a SWPrefetchEXResp. Previous patch misses cases when the prefetch response is ReadExResp or UpgradeResp. Also, marking the block as dirty in serviceMSHRTargets instead of in handleFill covers cases when the prefetch is coalesced with other requests. Change-Id: I2b377fdd240eb0f09e720b6bb284dee6545925ce Signed-off-by: Tiago Mück <tiago.muck@arm.com> Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/19688 Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br> Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
Completed in 33 milliseconds