Searched hist:14007 (Results 1 - 6 of 6) sorted by relevance
| /gem5/src/mem/ | ||
| H A D | secure_port_proxy.cc | 14007:36f842f523c6 Wed May 01 20:56:00 EDT 2019 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> arm, mem: Move the SecurePortProxy subclass into it's own file. The idea of a "secure" memory area/access is specific to ARM and shouldn't be in the common mem directory, although it's built in to the generic memory protocol at this point. Regardless, it should minimially be in its own file like the virtual and physical port proxy classes are. Change-Id: I140d4566ee2deded784adb04bcf6f11755a85c0c Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18569 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
| H A D | secure_port_proxy.hh | 14007:36f842f523c6 Wed May 01 20:56:00 EDT 2019 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> arm, mem: Move the SecurePortProxy subclass into it's own file. The idea of a "secure" memory area/access is specific to ARM and shouldn't be in the common mem directory, although it's built in to the generic memory protocol at this point. Regardless, it should minimially be in its own file like the virtual and physical port proxy classes are. Change-Id: I140d4566ee2deded784adb04bcf6f11755a85c0c Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18569 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
| H A D | port_proxy.hh | diff 14007:36f842f523c6 Wed May 01 20:56:00 EDT 2019 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> arm, mem: Move the SecurePortProxy subclass into it's own file. The idea of a "secure" memory area/access is specific to ARM and shouldn't be in the common mem directory, although it's built in to the generic memory protocol at this point. Regardless, it should minimially be in its own file like the virtual and physical port proxy classes are. Change-Id: I140d4566ee2deded784adb04bcf6f11755a85c0c Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18569 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
| H A D | port_proxy.cc | diff 14007:36f842f523c6 Wed May 01 20:56:00 EDT 2019 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> arm, mem: Move the SecurePortProxy subclass into it's own file. The idea of a "secure" memory area/access is specific to ARM and shouldn't be in the common mem directory, although it's built in to the generic memory protocol at this point. Regardless, it should minimially be in its own file like the virtual and physical port proxy classes are. Change-Id: I140d4566ee2deded784adb04bcf6f11755a85c0c Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18569 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
| H A D | SConscript | diff 14007:36f842f523c6 Wed May 01 20:56:00 EDT 2019 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> arm, mem: Move the SecurePortProxy subclass into it's own file. The idea of a "secure" memory area/access is specific to ARM and shouldn't be in the common mem directory, although it's built in to the generic memory protocol at this point. Regardless, it should minimially be in its own file like the virtual and physical port proxy classes are. Change-Id: I140d4566ee2deded784adb04bcf6f11755a85c0c Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18569 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
| /gem5/src/arch/arm/ | ||
| H A D | semihosting.cc | diff 14007:36f842f523c6 Wed May 01 20:56:00 EDT 2019 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> arm, mem: Move the SecurePortProxy subclass into it's own file. The idea of a "secure" memory area/access is specific to ARM and shouldn't be in the common mem directory, although it's built in to the generic memory protocol at this point. Regardless, it should minimially be in its own file like the virtual and physical port proxy classes are. Change-Id: I140d4566ee2deded784adb04bcf6f11755a85c0c Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18569 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
Completed in 39 milliseconds