Searched hist:14018 (Results 1 - 8 of 8) sorted by relevance
/gem5/src/arch/generic/linux/ | ||
H A D | threadinfo.hh | diff 14018:9d2153431f44 Thu May 02 00:43:00 EDT 2019 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> arch, base, sim: Replace Copy(String)?(In|Out) with equivalent code. This expands those functions into code which extracts the virt proxy and then uses the appropriate method on it. This has two benefits. First, the Copy* functions where mostly redundant wrappers around the methods the proxy port already had. Second, using them forced a particular port which might not actually be what the user wanted. Change-Id: I62084631dd080061e3c74997125164f40da2d77c Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18575 Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
/gem5/src/base/ | ||
H A D | cp_annotate.cc | diff 14018:9d2153431f44 Thu May 02 00:43:00 EDT 2019 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> arch, base, sim: Replace Copy(String)?(In|Out) with equivalent code. This expands those functions into code which extracts the virt proxy and then uses the appropriate method on it. This has two benefits. First, the Copy* functions where mostly redundant wrappers around the methods the proxy port already had. Second, using them forced a particular port which might not actually be what the user wanted. Change-Id: I62084631dd080061e3c74997125164f40da2d77c Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18575 Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
/gem5/src/arch/arm/ | ||
H A D | stacktrace.cc | diff 14018:9d2153431f44 Thu May 02 00:43:00 EDT 2019 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> arch, base, sim: Replace Copy(String)?(In|Out) with equivalent code. This expands those functions into code which extracts the virt proxy and then uses the appropriate method on it. This has two benefits. First, the Copy* functions where mostly redundant wrappers around the methods the proxy port already had. Second, using them forced a particular port which might not actually be what the user wanted. Change-Id: I62084631dd080061e3c74997125164f40da2d77c Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18575 Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
/gem5/src/arch/mips/ | ||
H A D | stacktrace.cc | diff 14018:9d2153431f44 Thu May 02 00:43:00 EDT 2019 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> arch, base, sim: Replace Copy(String)?(In|Out) with equivalent code. This expands those functions into code which extracts the virt proxy and then uses the appropriate method on it. This has two benefits. First, the Copy* functions where mostly redundant wrappers around the methods the proxy port already had. Second, using them forced a particular port which might not actually be what the user wanted. Change-Id: I62084631dd080061e3c74997125164f40da2d77c Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18575 Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
/gem5/src/arch/x86/ | ||
H A D | stacktrace.cc | diff 14018:9d2153431f44 Thu May 02 00:43:00 EDT 2019 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> arch, base, sim: Replace Copy(String)?(In|Out) with equivalent code. This expands those functions into code which extracts the virt proxy and then uses the appropriate method on it. This has two benefits. First, the Copy* functions where mostly redundant wrappers around the methods the proxy port already had. Second, using them forced a particular port which might not actually be what the user wanted. Change-Id: I62084631dd080061e3c74997125164f40da2d77c Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18575 Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
/gem5/src/sim/ | ||
H A D | arguments.hh | diff 14018:9d2153431f44 Thu May 02 00:43:00 EDT 2019 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> arch, base, sim: Replace Copy(String)?(In|Out) with equivalent code. This expands those functions into code which extracts the virt proxy and then uses the appropriate method on it. This has two benefits. First, the Copy* functions where mostly redundant wrappers around the methods the proxy port already had. Second, using them forced a particular port which might not actually be what the user wanted. Change-Id: I62084631dd080061e3c74997125164f40da2d77c Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18575 Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
H A D | pseudo_inst.cc | diff 14018:9d2153431f44 Thu May 02 00:43:00 EDT 2019 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> arch, base, sim: Replace Copy(String)?(In|Out) with equivalent code. This expands those functions into code which extracts the virt proxy and then uses the appropriate method on it. This has two benefits. First, the Copy* functions where mostly redundant wrappers around the methods the proxy port already had. Second, using them forced a particular port which might not actually be what the user wanted. Change-Id: I62084631dd080061e3c74997125164f40da2d77c Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18575 Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
/gem5/src/arch/alpha/ | ||
H A D | stacktrace.cc | diff 14018:9d2153431f44 Thu May 02 00:43:00 EDT 2019 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> arch, base, sim: Replace Copy(String)?(In|Out) with equivalent code. This expands those functions into code which extracts the virt proxy and then uses the appropriate method on it. This has two benefits. First, the Copy* functions where mostly redundant wrappers around the methods the proxy port already had. Second, using them forced a particular port which might not actually be what the user wanted. Change-Id: I62084631dd080061e3c74997125164f40da2d77c Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18575 Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> |
Completed in 53 milliseconds