python: Add binding for the new AddrRange c++ constructor

Change-Id: I5b3fb59a11d8587a753759310dd3b2748ac13a0b
Signed-off-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/19132
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>

base: Extend AddrRange to support more flexible addressing

Previously an AddrRange could express interleaving using a number of
consecutive bits and in additional optionally a second number of
consecutive bits. The two sets of consecutive bits would be xored and
matched against a value to determine if an address is in the
AddrRange. For example:

sel[0] = a[8] ^ a[12]
sel[1] = a[9] ^ a[13]
where sel == intlvMatch

This change extends AddrRange to allow more flexible interleavings
with an abritary number of set of bits which do not need be
consecutive. For example:

sel[0] = a[8] ^ a[11] ^ a[13]
sel[1] = a[15] ^ a[17] ^ a[19]
where sel == intlvMatch

Change-Id: I42220a6d5011a31f0560535762a25bfc823c3ebb
Signed-off-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/19130
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>

sim: Push the global frequency management code into C++.

That makes it available when python is left out, and makes it available
to c++ code without having to call back into python.

Change-Id: If82e7e8eff526f2b957f84afe046e1d56fed4aa2
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/14055
Reviewed-by: Srikant Bharadwaj <srikant.bharadwaj@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>

misc: Rename misc.(hh|cc) to logging.(hh|cc)

These files aren't a collection of miscellaneous stuff, they're the
definition of the Logger interface, and a few utility macros for
calling into that interface (panic, warn, etc.).

Change-Id: I84267ac3f45896a83c0ef027f8f19c5e9a5667d1
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/6226
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>

python: Prevent Python wrappers from deleting SimObjects

The PyBind wrappers could potentially delete SimObjects if they don't
have any references. This is not desirable since there could be
pointers to such objects within the C++ world. This problem doesn't
normally occur since Python typically holds a pointer to the root node
as long as the simulator is running.

Prevent SimObject and Param deletion by using a PyBind-prescribed
unique_ptr with a dummy deleter as the pointer wrapper for the Python
world.

Change-Id: Ied14602c9ee69a083a69c5dae1b5fcf8efb4548a
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Curtis Dunham <curtis.dunham@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/3224
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>

python: Fix weird memory issue in wrapped AddrRange vectors

There is a weird issue with the PyBind wrapper of
vector<AddrRange>. Assigning new values to a param that is a vector of
AddrRange sometimes results in an out-of-bounds memory access.

We work around this issue by treating AddrRange vectors as opaque
types. This slightly changes the semantics of the wrapper since Python
now manipulates the real object rather than a copy that has been
converted to a list.

Change-Id: Ie027c06e7a7262214b43b19a76b24fe4b20426c5
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Curtis Dunham <curtis.dunham@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/3223
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>

misc: Expose the listener loopbackOnly function to python.

Change-Id: Ibb405af54a46a93706a6f476b5314491e84be0c8
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/3081
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>

python: Use PyBind11 instead of SWIG for Python wrappers

Use the PyBind11 wrapping infrastructure instead of SWIG to generate
wrappers for functionality that needs to be exported to Python. This
has several benefits:

* PyBind11 can be redistributed with gem5, which means that we have
full control of the version used. This avoid a large number of
hard-to-debug SWIG issues we have seen in the past.

* PyBind11 doesn't rely on a custom C++ parser, instead it relies on
wrappers being explicitly declared in C++. The leads to slightly
more boiler-plate code in manually created wrappers, but doesn't
doesn't increase the overall code size. A big benefit is that this
avoids strange compilation errors when SWIG doesn't understand
modern language features.

* Unlike SWIG, there is no risk that the wrapper code incorporates
incorrect type casts (this has happened on numerous occasions in
the past) since these will result in compile-time errors.

As a part of this change, the mechanism to define exported methods has
been redesigned slightly. New methods can be exported either by
declaring them in the SimObject declaration and decorating them with
the cxxMethod decorator or by adding an instance of
PyBindMethod/PyBindProperty to the cxx_exports class variable. The
decorator has the added benefit of making it possible to add a
docstring and naming the method's parameters.

The new wrappers have the following known issues:

* Global events can't be memory managed correctly. This was the
case in SWIG as well.

Change-Id: I88c5a95b6cf6c32fa9e1ad31dfc08b2e8199a763
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bardsley <andrew.bardsley@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/2231
Reviewed-by: Tony Gutierrez <anthony.gutierrez@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Yves Péneau <pierre-yves.peneau@lirmm.fr>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>