#
11111:6da33e720481 |
|
16-Sep-2015 |
Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> |
ruby: message buffer, timer table: significant changes
This patch changes MessageBuffer and TimerTable, two structures used for buffering messages by components in ruby. These structures would no longer maintain pointers to clock objects. Functions in these structures have been changed to take as input current time in Tick. Similarly, these structures will not operate on Cycle valued latencies for different operations. The corresponding functions would need to be provided with these latencies by components invoking the relevant functions. These latencies should also be in Ticks.
I felt the need for these changes while trying to speed up ruby. The ultimate aim is to eliminate Consumer class and replace it with an EventManager object in the MessageBuffer and TimerTable classes. This object would be used for scheduling events. The event itself would contain information on the object and function to be invoked.
In hindsight, it seems I should have done this while I was moving away from use of a single global clock in the memory system. That change led to introduction of clock objects that replaced the global clock object. It never crossed my mind that having clock object pointers is not a good design. And now I really don't like the fact that we have separate consumer, receiver and sender pointers in message buffers.
|
#
11021:e8a6637afa4c |
|
14-Aug-2015 |
Joel Hestness <jthestness@gmail.com> |
ruby: Expose MessageBuffers as SimObjects
Expose MessageBuffers from SLICC controllers as SimObjects that can be manipulated in Python. This patch has numerous benefits: 1) First and foremost, it exposes MessageBuffers as SimObjects that can be manipulated in Python code. This allows parameters to be set and checked in Python code to avoid obfuscating parameters within protocol files. Further, now as SimObjects, MessageBuffer parameters are printed to config output files as a way to track parameters across simulations (e.g. buffer sizes)
2) Cleans up special-case code for responseFromMemory buffers, and aligns their instantiation and use with mandatoryQueue buffers. These two special buffers are the only MessageBuffers that are exposed to components outside of SLICC controllers, and they're both slave ends of these buffers. They should be exposed outside of SLICC in the same way, and this patch does it.
3) Distinguishes buffer-specific parameters from buffer-to-network parameters. Specifically, buffer size, randomization, ordering, recycle latency, and ports are all specific to a MessageBuffer, while the virtual network ID and type are intrinsics of how the buffer is connected to network ports. The former are specified in the Python object, while the latter are specified in the controller *.sm files. Unlike buffer-specific parameters, which may need to change depending on the simulated system structure, buffer-to-network parameters can be specified statically for most or all different simulated systems.
|
#
10308:8c0870dbae5c |
|
01-Sep-2014 |
Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> |
ruby: slicc: change the way configurable members are specified There are two changes this patch makes to the way configurable members of a state machine are specified in SLICC. The first change is that the data member declarations will need to be separated by a semi-colon instead of a comma. Secondly, the default value to be assigned would now use SLICC's assignment operator i.e. ':='.
|
#
10307:6df951dcd7d9 |
|
01-Sep-2014 |
Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> |
ruby: slicc: improve the grammar This patch changes the grammar for SLICC so as to remove some of the redundant / duplicate rules. In particular rules for object/variable declaration and class member declaration have been unified. Similarly, the rules for a general function and a class method have been unified.
One more change is in the priority of two rules. The first rule is on declaring a function with all the params typed and named. The second rule is on declaring a function with all the params only typed. Earlier the second rule had a higher priority. Now the first rule has a higher priority.
|
#
10305:76745b567dc3 |
|
01-Sep-2014 |
Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> |
ruby: slicc: donot prefix machine name to variables This changeset does away with prefixing of member variables of state machines with the identity of the machine itself.
|
#
10075:7322d2b2ec76 |
|
20-Feb-2014 |
Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> |
ruby: slicc: slight code refactoring
|
#
10005:8c2b0dc16ccd |
|
04-Jan-2014 |
Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> |
ruby: add support for clusters
A cluster over here means a set of controllers that can be accessed only by a certain set of cores. For example, consider a two level hierarchy. Assume there are 4 L1 controllers (private) and 2 L2 controllers. We can have two different hierarchies here:
a. the address space is partitioned between the two L2 controllers. Each L1 controller accesses both the L2 controllers. In this case, each L1 controller is a cluster initself.
b. both the L2 controllers can cache any address. An L1 controller has access to only one of the L2 controllers. In this case, each L2 controller along with the L1 controllers that access it, form a cluster.
This patch allows for each controller to have a cluster ID, which is 0 by default. By setting the cluster ID properly, one can instantiate hierarchies with clusters. Note that the coherence protocol might have to be changed as well.
|
#
9595:470016acf37d |
|
22-Mar-2013 |
Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> |
ruby: connect two controllers using only message buffers This patch modifies ruby so that two controllers can be connected to each other with only message buffers in between. Before this patch, all the controllers had to be connected to the network for them to communicate with each other. With this patch, one can have protocols where a controller is not connected to the network, but communicates with another controller through a message buffer.
|
#
9366:bf8eb26c7b7e |
|
11-Dec-2012 |
Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> |
ruby: add support for prefetching to MESI protocol
|
#
9271:3859f5d4f2c6 |
|
02-Oct-2012 |
Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> |
ruby: remove some unused things in slicc This patch removes the parts of slicc that were required for multi-chip protocols. Going ahead, it seems multi-chip protocols would be implemented by playing with the network itself.
|
#
6657:ef5fae93a3b2 |
|
22-Sep-2009 |
Nathan Binkert <nate@binkert.org> |
slicc: Pure python implementation of slicc. This is simply a translation of the C++ slicc into python with very minimal reorganization of the code. The output can be verified as nearly identical by doing a "diff -wBur".
Slicc can easily be run manually by using util/slicc
|