Searched hist:9364 (Results 1 - 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
/gem5/src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/ | ||
H A D | AbstractController.cc | 9364:e5fc9d588132 Tue Dec 11 11:05:00 EST 2012 Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> ruby: change slicc to allow for constructor args The patch adds support to slicc for recognizing arguments that should be passed to the constructor of a class. I did not like the fact that an explicit check was being carried on the type 'TBETable' to figure out the arguments to be passed to the constructor. The patch also moves some of the member variables that are declared for all the controllers to the base class AbstractController. |
H A D | AbstractController.hh | 9364:e5fc9d588132 Tue Dec 11 11:05:00 EST 2012 Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> ruby: change slicc to allow for constructor args The patch adds support to slicc for recognizing arguments that should be passed to the constructor of a class. I did not like the fact that an explicit check was being carried on the type 'TBETable' to figure out the arguments to be passed to the constructor. The patch also moves some of the member variables that are declared for all the controllers to the base class AbstractController. |
/gem5/src/mem/slicc/symbols/ | ||
H A D | StateMachine.py | 9364:e5fc9d588132 Tue Dec 11 11:05:00 EST 2012 Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> ruby: change slicc to allow for constructor args The patch adds support to slicc for recognizing arguments that should be passed to the constructor of a class. I did not like the fact that an explicit check was being carried on the type 'TBETable' to figure out the arguments to be passed to the constructor. The patch also moves some of the member variables that are declared for all the controllers to the base class AbstractController. |
Completed in 55 milliseconds