Searched hist:11178 (Results 1 - 6 of 6) sorted by relevance
| /gem5/src/arch/arm/kvm/ | ||
| H A D | arm_cpu.cc | 11178:555325cbf464 Thu Oct 29 08:48:00 EDT 2015 Victor Garcia <victor.garcia@arm.com> kvm, arm: Fix compilation errors due to API changes The checkpoint changes, along with the SMT patches have changed a number of APIs. Adapt the ArmKvmCPU accordingly. |
| H A D | base_cpu.cc | 11178:555325cbf464 Thu Oct 29 08:48:00 EDT 2015 Victor Garcia <victor.garcia@arm.com> kvm, arm: Fix compilation errors due to API changes The checkpoint changes, along with the SMT patches have changed a number of APIs. Adapt the ArmKvmCPU accordingly. |
| H A D | armv8_cpu.hh | 11178:555325cbf464 Thu Oct 29 08:48:00 EDT 2015 Victor Garcia <victor.garcia@arm.com> kvm, arm: Fix compilation errors due to API changes The checkpoint changes, along with the SMT patches have changed a number of APIs. Adapt the ArmKvmCPU accordingly. |
| H A D | armv8_cpu.cc | 11178:555325cbf464 Thu Oct 29 08:48:00 EDT 2015 Victor Garcia <victor.garcia@arm.com> kvm, arm: Fix compilation errors due to API changes The checkpoint changes, along with the SMT patches have changed a number of APIs. Adapt the ArmKvmCPU accordingly. |
| H A D | gic.hh | 11178:555325cbf464 Thu Oct 29 08:48:00 EDT 2015 Victor Garcia <victor.garcia@arm.com> kvm, arm: Fix compilation errors due to API changes The checkpoint changes, along with the SMT patches have changed a number of APIs. Adapt the ArmKvmCPU accordingly. |
| /gem5/src/systemc/ext/ | ||
| H A D | systemc | 12873:9e8c1b5de92c Mon Jun 11 21:53:00 EDT 2018 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> systemc: Include boost/bind.hpp in the systemc header. The systemc spec says that sc_bind, sc_ref and sc_cref macros should expand to boost::bind, boost::ref, and boost::cref respectively, but that it's "use is not mandantory". Unfortunately, the regression tests use those macros without actually including the boost headers for themselves, and so they won't compile without dragging in these boost headers as a dependency. This should be mostly ok to include here since gem5 itself shouldn't include systemc, just the sub headers that systemc brings in. systemc code which includes systemc *will* have a dependency on boost, but that at least contains the new dependency somewhat. Change-Id: I1877a1b7dae2952f30a9d577d778739abbe7ac3b Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/11178 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> |
Completed in 22 milliseconds