Search

Home

Sort by

Full Search
Definition
Symbol
File Path
History
Type

In Project(s)

Searched hist:10601 (Results 1 - 13 of 13) sorted by relevance

/gem5/src/arch/power/
H A D	remote_gdb.hh	10601:6efb37480d87 Sat Dec 06 01:37:00 EST 2014 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> misc: Generalize GDB single stepping. The new single stepping implementation for x86 doesn't rely on any ISA specific properties or functionality. This change pulls out the per ISA implementation of those functions and promotes the X86 implementation to the base class. One drawback of that implementation is that the CPU might stop on an instruction twice if it's affected by both breakpoints and single stepping. While that might be a little surprising, it's harmless and would only happen under somewhat unlikely circumstances.
/gem5/src/arch/alpha/
H A D	remote_gdb.hh	10601:6efb37480d87 Sat Dec 06 01:37:00 EST 2014 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> misc: Generalize GDB single stepping. The new single stepping implementation for x86 doesn't rely on any ISA specific properties or functionality. This change pulls out the per ISA implementation of those functions and promotes the X86 implementation to the base class. One drawback of that implementation is that the CPU might stop on an instruction twice if it's affected by both breakpoints and single stepping. While that might be a little surprising, it's harmless and would only happen under somewhat unlikely circumstances.
H A D	remote_gdb.cc	10601:6efb37480d87 Sat Dec 06 01:37:00 EST 2014 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> misc: Generalize GDB single stepping. The new single stepping implementation for x86 doesn't rely on any ISA specific properties or functionality. This change pulls out the per ISA implementation of those functions and promotes the X86 implementation to the base class. One drawback of that implementation is that the CPU might stop on an instruction twice if it's affected by both breakpoints and single stepping. While that might be a little surprising, it's harmless and would only happen under somewhat unlikely circumstances.
/gem5/src/arch/mips/
H A D	remote_gdb.hh	10601:6efb37480d87 Sat Dec 06 01:37:00 EST 2014 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> misc: Generalize GDB single stepping. The new single stepping implementation for x86 doesn't rely on any ISA specific properties or functionality. This change pulls out the per ISA implementation of those functions and promotes the X86 implementation to the base class. One drawback of that implementation is that the CPU might stop on an instruction twice if it's affected by both breakpoints and single stepping. While that might be a little surprising, it's harmless and would only happen under somewhat unlikely circumstances.
H A D	remote_gdb.cc	10601:6efb37480d87 Sat Dec 06 01:37:00 EST 2014 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> misc: Generalize GDB single stepping. The new single stepping implementation for x86 doesn't rely on any ISA specific properties or functionality. This change pulls out the per ISA implementation of those functions and promotes the X86 implementation to the base class. One drawback of that implementation is that the CPU might stop on an instruction twice if it's affected by both breakpoints and single stepping. While that might be a little surprising, it's harmless and would only happen under somewhat unlikely circumstances.
/gem5/src/arch/x86/
H A D	remote_gdb.cc	10601:6efb37480d87 Sat Dec 06 01:37:00 EST 2014 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> misc: Generalize GDB single stepping. The new single stepping implementation for x86 doesn't rely on any ISA specific properties or functionality. This change pulls out the per ISA implementation of those functions and promotes the X86 implementation to the base class. One drawback of that implementation is that the CPU might stop on an instruction twice if it's affected by both breakpoints and single stepping. While that might be a little surprising, it's harmless and would only happen under somewhat unlikely circumstances.
H A D	remote_gdb.hh	10601:6efb37480d87 Sat Dec 06 01:37:00 EST 2014 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> misc: Generalize GDB single stepping. The new single stepping implementation for x86 doesn't rely on any ISA specific properties or functionality. This change pulls out the per ISA implementation of those functions and promotes the X86 implementation to the base class. One drawback of that implementation is that the CPU might stop on an instruction twice if it's affected by both breakpoints and single stepping. While that might be a little surprising, it's harmless and would only happen under somewhat unlikely circumstances.
/gem5/src/arch/sparc/
H A D	remote_gdb.hh	10601:6efb37480d87 Sat Dec 06 01:37:00 EST 2014 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> misc: Generalize GDB single stepping. The new single stepping implementation for x86 doesn't rely on any ISA specific properties or functionality. This change pulls out the per ISA implementation of those functions and promotes the X86 implementation to the base class. One drawback of that implementation is that the CPU might stop on an instruction twice if it's affected by both breakpoints and single stepping. While that might be a little surprising, it's harmless and would only happen under somewhat unlikely circumstances.
H A D	remote_gdb.cc	10601:6efb37480d87 Sat Dec 06 01:37:00 EST 2014 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> misc: Generalize GDB single stepping. The new single stepping implementation for x86 doesn't rely on any ISA specific properties or functionality. This change pulls out the per ISA implementation of those functions and promotes the X86 implementation to the base class. One drawback of that implementation is that the CPU might stop on an instruction twice if it's affected by both breakpoints and single stepping. While that might be a little surprising, it's harmless and would only happen under somewhat unlikely circumstances.
/gem5/src/arch/arm/
H A D	remote_gdb.hh	10601:6efb37480d87 Sat Dec 06 01:37:00 EST 2014 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> misc: Generalize GDB single stepping. The new single stepping implementation for x86 doesn't rely on any ISA specific properties or functionality. This change pulls out the per ISA implementation of those functions and promotes the X86 implementation to the base class. One drawback of that implementation is that the CPU might stop on an instruction twice if it's affected by both breakpoints and single stepping. While that might be a little surprising, it's harmless and would only happen under somewhat unlikely circumstances.
H A D	remote_gdb.cc	10601:6efb37480d87 Sat Dec 06 01:37:00 EST 2014 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> misc: Generalize GDB single stepping. The new single stepping implementation for x86 doesn't rely on any ISA specific properties or functionality. This change pulls out the per ISA implementation of those functions and promotes the X86 implementation to the base class. One drawback of that implementation is that the CPU might stop on an instruction twice if it's affected by both breakpoints and single stepping. While that might be a little surprising, it's harmless and would only happen under somewhat unlikely circumstances.
/gem5/src/base/
H A D	remote_gdb.hh	10601:6efb37480d87 Sat Dec 06 01:37:00 EST 2014 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> misc: Generalize GDB single stepping. The new single stepping implementation for x86 doesn't rely on any ISA specific properties or functionality. This change pulls out the per ISA implementation of those functions and promotes the X86 implementation to the base class. One drawback of that implementation is that the CPU might stop on an instruction twice if it's affected by both breakpoints and single stepping. While that might be a little surprising, it's harmless and would only happen under somewhat unlikely circumstances.
H A D	remote_gdb.cc	10601:6efb37480d87 Sat Dec 06 01:37:00 EST 2014 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> misc: Generalize GDB single stepping. The new single stepping implementation for x86 doesn't rely on any ISA specific properties or functionality. This change pulls out the per ISA implementation of those functions and promotes the X86 implementation to the base class. One drawback of that implementation is that the CPU might stop on an instruction twice if it's affected by both breakpoints and single stepping. While that might be a little surprising, it's harmless and would only happen under somewhat unlikely circumstances.

Completed in 47 milliseconds