systemc: Get rid of leftovers from unimplemented warnings past.

These warnings were removed when the functionality they warned about
was implemented, but there were some leftovers like unnecessary
includes and some helper functions which hid gem5 specific headers
from the ext directory.

Change-Id: Ic886ac0f1264687524e3a7b7eaab8836f318a5a2
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13398
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>

systemc: Switch to using predefined messages for core.

Create and use predefined messages for core which match the ones
Accellera uses.

Change-Id: I05b1398933f753946d5917f39d0f39c7cb45ed9f
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13323
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>

systemc: Ignore immediate self notifications.

Change-Id: If5140bd86159e9257eb9e6ccb8301dd6349dacff
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13310
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>

systemc: Change how signal based resets work.

The previous implementation used the value changed event to track when
signals changed value, but there were a couple problems with this
approach. First, this piggybacked on the sensitivity mechanism in some
ways, but diverged in others. The sensitivity didn't notify a process
when it was satisfied like other sensitivity types would, and it also
ignored whether the process was disabled.

Second, the value_changed_event is notified by a signal instance as a
delta notification, but reset signals are supposed to act immediately.
That means they should happen before all delta notifications, or in
other words all delta notifications should see the reset status of a
given process. That's particularly important in the case of wait(int n)
where setting the reset clears the reset count, and the count is
checked when determining whether or not to wake up a process when its
sensitivity is satisfied, potentially by a delta notification.

Third, by removing the middle man and not trying to repurpose the
sensitivity mechanism, the code gets simpler and easier to understand.

Change-Id: I0d05d11437291d368b060f6a45a207813615f113
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13294
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>

systemc: Merge notify and notifyWork and ignore disabled for resets.

Always notify a process if a reset signal changed, even if it's
disabled. Also, because notify was what checked disabled and only
notifyWork was virtual, this change merges the two so both can be
overridden without any extra virtual functions.

Change-Id: I1e3563fa587aab65a5e95cd8a382ed48e093de3b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13188
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>

systemc: Implement signal based resets.

The implementation is based on sc_event sensitivities.

Also of note is that the way reset works in the Accellera
implementation isn't consistent with the spec. That says that
wait(int n) is supposed to be equivalent to calling wait() n times,
assuming n is greater than 0.

Instead, Accellera stores that count and then doesn't wake up the
process until the count is 0, decrementing it otherwise.

That means that when the process is in reset, it won't actually reset
for those intermediate wait()s which it would if wait() was called
repeatedly. Also, oddly, when a reset becomes asserted, it will clear
the count to 0 explicitly. That may have been an attempt to make the
behavior of wait(int n) match the spec, but it doesn't handle cases
where the reset is already set when wait(int n) is called.

Change-Id: I92f8e9a128e6618af94dc048ce570a4436e17e4b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13186
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>

systemc: Differentiate between notifying methods and threads.

The Accellera implementation notifies all types of method
sensitivities first, and then notifies all the ones for threads.

Change-Id: I5eda75958675ba518f008852148030e032f70d83
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/12807
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>

systemc: Rework how delayed sensitivities are handled.

Make BindInfo into a more general purpose Port class which mirrors
sc_module and Module, sc_object and Object, etc. This tracks multiple
bindings internally, and also pending sensitivities. Keep a global
list of ports which are added in reverse order to match Accellera, and
which is iterated over to finalize binding and for phase callbacks.
This is as opposed to doing it one module at a time, and is to better
match Accellera's ordering for the regressions.

Also the sensitivity classes are now built with factory functions,
which gets around problems calling virtual functions from their
constructors or forgetting to having to have extra boilerplate each
place they're constructed.

The port class also now finalizes port or event finder sensitivities
when its binding is completed, unless it's already complete in which
case it does so immediately.

Change-Id: I1b01689715c425b94e0f68cf0271f5c1565d8c61
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/12806
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>

systemc: Refactor sensitivities.

Dynamic and Static sensitivities used to be represented by the same
classes, even though they're (almost) disjoint in how they worked. Also
timeouts, which can be used alongside dynamic sensitivities, were
handled by the sensitivities themselves. That meant that the
sensitivity mechanism had to mix in more types of behaviors,
increasing complexity. Also, the non-standard timed_out function
Accellera includes is harder to implement if the path for timeouts and
regular sensitivities are mixed together.

This change splits up dynamic and static sensitivities and splits out
timeouts. It also immitates the ordering Accellera uses when going
through sensitivities for an event. Static sensitivities are triggered
first in reverse order (why?), and then dynamic sensitivities are
triggered in what amounts to reverse order. To delete a sensitivity
which has been handled, it's swapped with the one in the last position,
and then the vector is truncated to drop it at the end. This has the
net effect of stirring the dynamic sensitivities, and isn't easily
immitated using a different approach, even if other approaches would
be more straightforward.

Double check addSensitivity for event.hh

Change-Id: I1e73dce386b95f68e9d6737deb8bed70ef717e0d
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/12805
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>