CONTRIBUTING.md revision 11977:19ba22e1e6f3
1Authors: Jason Lowe-Power 2 Andreas Sandberg 3 Steve Reinhardt 4 5If you've made changes to gem5 that might benefit others, we strongly encourage 6you to contribute those changes to the public gem5 repository. There are 7several reasons to do this: 8 * Share your work with others, so that they can benefit from new functionality. 9 * Support the scientific principle by enabling others to evaluate your 10 suggestions without having to guess what you did. 11 * Once your changes are part of the main repo, you no longer have to merge 12 them back in every time you update your local repo. This can be a huge time 13 saving! 14 * Once your code is in the main repo, other people have to make their changes 15 work with your code, and not the other way around. 16 * Others may build on your contributions to make them even better, or extend 17 them in ways you did not have time to do. 18 * You will have the satisfaction of contributing back to the community. 19 20The main method for contributing code to gem5 is via our code review website: 21https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/. This documents describes the details of 22how to create code changes, upload your changes, have your changes 23reviewed, and finally push your changes to gem5. More information can be found 24from the following sources: 25 * http://gem5.org/Submitting_Contributions 26 * https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/index.html 27 * https://git-scm.com/book 28 29 30High-level flow for submitting changes 31====================================== 32 33 +-------------+ 34 | Make change | 35 +------+------+ 36 | 37 | 38 v 39 +------+------+ 40 | Post review | 41 +------+------+ 42 | 43 v 44 +--------+---------+ 45 | Wait for reviews | <--------+ 46 +--------+---------+ | 47 | | 48 | | 49 v | 50 +----+----+ No +------+------+ 51 |Reviewers+--------->+ Update code | 52 |happy? | +------+------+ 53 +----+----+ ^ 54 | | 55 | Yes | 56 v | 57 +----+-----+ No | 58 |Maintainer+----------------+ 59 |happy? | 60 +----+-----+ 61 | 62 | Yes 63 v 64 +------+------+ 65 | Submit code | 66 +-------------+ 67 68After creating your change to gem5, you can post a review on our Gerrit 69code-review site: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com. Before being able to 70submit your code to the mainline of gem5, the code is reviewed by others in the 71community. Additionally, the maintainer for that part of the code must sign off 72on it. 73 74Cloning the gem5 repo to contribute 75=================================== 76 77If you plan on contributing, it is strongly encouraged for you to clone the 78repository directly from our gerrit instance at 79https://gem5.googlesource.com/. 80 81To clone the master gem5 repository: 82 > git clone https://gem5.googlesource.com/public/gem5 83 84Other gem5 repositories 85----------------------- 86 87There are a few repositories other than the main gem5 development repository. 88 89 * public/m5threads: The code for a pthreads implementation that works with 90 gem5's syscall emulation mode. 91 92Other gem5 branches 93------------------- 94 95None right now. 96 97Making changes to gem5 98====================== 99 100It is strongly encouraged to use git branches when making changes to gem5. 101Additionally, keeping changes small and concise and only have a single logical 102change per commit. 103 104Unlike our previous flow with Mercurial and patch queues, when using git, you 105will be committing changes to your local branch. By using separate branches in 106git, you will be able to pull in and merge changes from mainline and simply 107keep up with upstream changes. 108 109Requirements for change descriptions 110------------------------------------ 111To help reviewers and future contributors more easily understand and track 112changes, we require all change descriptions be strictly formatted. 113 114A canonical commit message consists of three parts: 115 * A short summary line describing the change. This line starts with one or 116 more keywords (found in the MAINTAINERS file) separated by commas followed 117 by a colon and a description of the change. This line should be no more than 118 65 characters long since version control systems usually add a prefix that 119 causes line-wrapping for longer lines. 120 * (Optional, but highly recommended) A detailed description. This describes 121 what you have done and why. If the change isn't obvious, you might want to 122 motivate why it is needed. Lines need to be wrapped to 75 characters or 123 less. 124 * Tags describing patch metadata. You are highly recommended to use 125 tags to acknowledge reviewers for their work. Gerrit will automatically add 126 most tags. 127 128Tags are an optional mechanism to store additional metadata about a patch and 129acknowledge people who reported a bug or reviewed that patch. Tags are 130generally appended to the end of the commit message in the order they happen. 131We currently use the following tags: 132 * Signed-off-by: Added by the author and the submitter (if different). 133 This tag is a statement saying that you believe the patch to be correct and 134 have the right to submit the patch according to the license in the affected 135 files. Similarly, if you commit someone else's patch, this tells the rest 136 of the world that you have have the right to forward it to the main 137 repository. If you need to make any changes at all to submit the change, 138 these should be described within hard brackets just before your 139 Signed-off-by tag. By adding this line, the contributor certifies the 140 contribution is made under the terms of the Developer Certificate of Origin 141 (DCO) [https://developercertificate.org/]. 142 * Reviewed-by: Used to acknowledge patch reviewers. It's generally considered 143 good form to add these. Added automatically. 144 * Reported-by: Used to acknowledge someone for finding and reporting a bug. 145 * Reviewed-on: Link to the review request corresponding to this patch. Added 146 automatically. 147 * Change-Id: Used by Gerrit to track changes across rebases. Added 148 automatically with a commit hook by git. 149 * Tested-by: Used to acknowledge people who tested a patch. Sometimes added 150 automatically by review systems that integrate with CI systems. 151 152Other than the "Signed-off-by", "Reported-by", and "Tested-by" tags, you 153generally don't need to add these manually as they are added automatically by 154Gerrit. 155 156It is encouraged for the author of the patch and the submitter to add a 157Signed-off-by tag to the commit message. By adding this line, the contributor 158certifies the contribution is made under the terms of the Developer Certificate 159of Origin (DCO) [https://developercertificate.org/]. 160 161It is imperative that you use your real name and your real email address in 162both tags and in the author field of the changeset. 163 164For significant changes, authors are encouraged to add copyright information 165and their names at the beginning of the file. The main purpose of the author 166names on the file is to track who is most knowledgeable about the file (e.g., 167who has contributed a significant amount of code to the file). 168 169Note: If you do not follow these guidelines, the gerrit review site will 170automatically reject your patch. 171If this happens, update your changeset descriptions to match the required style 172and resubmit. The following is a useful git command to update the most recent 173commit (HEAD). 174 175 > git commit --amend 176 177Posting a review 178================ 179 180If you have not signed up for an account on the Gerrit review site 181(https://gem5-review.googlesource.com), you first have to create an account. 182 183Setting up an account 184--------------------- 185 1. Go to https://gem5.googlesource.com/ 186 2. Click "Sign In" in the upper right corner. Note: You will need a Google 187 account to contribute. 188 3. After signing in, click "Generate Password" and follow the instructions. 189 190Submitting a change 191------------------- 192 193In gerrit, to submit a review request, you can simply push your git commits to 194a special named branch. For more information on git push see 195https://git-scm.com/docs/git-push. 196 197There are three ways to push your changes to gerrit. 198 199Push change to gerrit review 200---------------------------- 201 202 > git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master 203 204Assuming origin is https://gem5.googlesource.com/public/gem5 and you want to 205push the changeset at HEAD, this will create a new review request on top of the 206master branch. More generally, 207 208 > git push <gem5 gerrit instance> <changeset>:refs/for/<branch> 209 210See https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-upload.html for 211more information. 212 213Pushing your first change 214-------------------------- 215The first time you push a change you may get the following error: 216 217 > remote: ERROR: [fb1366b] missing Change-Id in commit message footer 218 > ... 219 220Within the error message, there is a command line you should run. For every new 221clone of the git repo, you need to run the following command to automatically 222insert the change id in the the commit (all on one line). 223 224 > curl -Lo `git rev-parse --git-dir`/hooks/commit-msg 225 https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/tools/hooks/commit-msg ; chmod +x 226 `git rev-parse --git-dir`/hooks/commit-msg 227 228If you receive the above error, simply run this command and then amend your 229changeset. 230 231 > git commit --amend 232 233Push change to gerrit as a draft 234-------------------------------- 235 236 > git push origin HEAD:refs/drafts/master 237 238Push change bypassing gerrit 239----------------------------- 240 241Only maintainers can bypass gerrit review. This should very rarely be used. 242 243 > git push origin HEAD:refs/heads/master 244 245Other gerrit push options 246------------------------- 247 248There are a number of options you can specify when uploading your changes to 249gerrit (e.g., reviewers, labels). The gerrit documentation has more 250information. 251https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-upload.html 252 253 254Reviewing patches 255================= 256 257Reviewing patches is done on our gerrit instance at 258https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/. 259 260After logging in with your Google account, you will be able to comment, review, 261and push your own patches as well as review others' patches. All gem5 users are 262encouraged to review patches. The only requirement to review patches is to be 263polite and respectful of others. 264 265There are multiple labels in Gerrit that can be applied to each review detailed 266below. 267 * Code-review: This is used by any gem5 user to review patches. When reviewing 268 a patch you can give it a score of -2 to +2 with the following semantics. 269 * -2: This blocks the patch. You believe that this patch should never be 270 committed. This label should be very rarely used. 271 * -1: You would prefer this is not merged as is 272 * 0: No score 273 * +1: This patch seems good, but you aren't 100% confident that it should be 274 pushed. 275 * +2: This is a good patch and should be pushed as is. 276 * Maintainer: Currently only PMC members are maintainers. At least one 277 maintainer must review your patch and give it a +1 before it can be merged. 278 * Verified: This is automatically generated from the continuous integrated 279 (CI) tests. Each patch must receive at least a +1 from the CI tests before 280 the patch can be merged. The patch will receive a +1 if gem5 builds and 281 runs, and it will receive a +2 if the stats match. 282 * Style-Check: This is automatically generated and tests the patch against the 283 gem5 code style (http://www.gem5.org/Coding_Style). The patch must receive a 284 +1 from the style checker to be pushed. 285 286Note: Whenever the patch creator updates the patch all reviewers must re-review 287the patch. There is no longer a "Fix it, then Ship It" option. 288 289Once you have received reviews for your patch, you will likely need to make 290changes. To do this, you should update the original git changeset. Then, you 291can simply push the changeset again to the same Gerrit branch to update the 292review request. 293 294 > git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master 295 296Note: If you have posted a patch and don't receive any reviews, you may need to 297prod the reviewers. You can do this by adding a reply to your changeset review 298on gerrit. It is expected that at least the maintainer will supply a review for 299your patch. 300 301Committing changes 302================== 303 304Each patch must meet the following criteria to be merged: 305 * At least one review with +2 306 * At least one maintainer with +1 307 * At least +1 from the CI tests (gem5 must build and run) 308 * At least +1 from the style checker 309 310Once a patch meets the above criteria, the submitter of the patch will be able 311to merge the patch by pressing the "Submit" button on Gerrit. When the patch is 312submitted, it is merged into the public gem5 branch. 313