Searched hist:11190 (Results 1 - 12 of 12) sorted by relevance
/gem5/src/mem/ | ||
H A D | dramsim2.hh | diff 11190:0964165d1857 Fri Nov 06 03:26:00 EST 2015 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> mem: Unify delayed packet deletion This patch unifies how we deal with delayed packet deletion, where the receiving slave is responsible for deleting the packet, but the sending agent (e.g. a cache) is still relying on the pointer until the call to sendTimingReq completes. Previously we used a mix of a deletion vector and a construct using unique_ptr. With this patch we ensure all slaves use the latter approach. |
H A D | dramsim2.cc | diff 11190:0964165d1857 Fri Nov 06 03:26:00 EST 2015 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> mem: Unify delayed packet deletion This patch unifies how we deal with delayed packet deletion, where the receiving slave is responsible for deleting the packet, but the sending agent (e.g. a cache) is still relying on the pointer until the call to sendTimingReq completes. Previously we used a mix of a deletion vector and a construct using unique_ptr. With this patch we ensure all slaves use the latter approach. |
H A D | simple_mem.hh | diff 11190:0964165d1857 Fri Nov 06 03:26:00 EST 2015 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> mem: Unify delayed packet deletion This patch unifies how we deal with delayed packet deletion, where the receiving slave is responsible for deleting the packet, but the sending agent (e.g. a cache) is still relying on the pointer until the call to sendTimingReq completes. Previously we used a mix of a deletion vector and a construct using unique_ptr. With this patch we ensure all slaves use the latter approach. |
H A D | coherent_xbar.hh | diff 11190:0964165d1857 Fri Nov 06 03:26:00 EST 2015 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> mem: Unify delayed packet deletion This patch unifies how we deal with delayed packet deletion, where the receiving slave is responsible for deleting the packet, but the sending agent (e.g. a cache) is still relying on the pointer until the call to sendTimingReq completes. Previously we used a mix of a deletion vector and a construct using unique_ptr. With this patch we ensure all slaves use the latter approach. |
H A D | tport.hh | diff 11190:0964165d1857 Fri Nov 06 03:26:00 EST 2015 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> mem: Unify delayed packet deletion This patch unifies how we deal with delayed packet deletion, where the receiving slave is responsible for deleting the packet, but the sending agent (e.g. a cache) is still relying on the pointer until the call to sendTimingReq completes. Previously we used a mix of a deletion vector and a construct using unique_ptr. With this patch we ensure all slaves use the latter approach. |
H A D | simple_mem.cc | diff 11190:0964165d1857 Fri Nov 06 03:26:00 EST 2015 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> mem: Unify delayed packet deletion This patch unifies how we deal with delayed packet deletion, where the receiving slave is responsible for deleting the packet, but the sending agent (e.g. a cache) is still relying on the pointer until the call to sendTimingReq completes. Previously we used a mix of a deletion vector and a construct using unique_ptr. With this patch we ensure all slaves use the latter approach. |
H A D | tport.cc | diff 11190:0964165d1857 Fri Nov 06 03:26:00 EST 2015 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> mem: Unify delayed packet deletion This patch unifies how we deal with delayed packet deletion, where the receiving slave is responsible for deleting the packet, but the sending agent (e.g. a cache) is still relying on the pointer until the call to sendTimingReq completes. Previously we used a mix of a deletion vector and a construct using unique_ptr. With this patch we ensure all slaves use the latter approach. |
H A D | coherent_xbar.cc | diff 11190:0964165d1857 Fri Nov 06 03:26:00 EST 2015 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> mem: Unify delayed packet deletion This patch unifies how we deal with delayed packet deletion, where the receiving slave is responsible for deleting the packet, but the sending agent (e.g. a cache) is still relying on the pointer until the call to sendTimingReq completes. Previously we used a mix of a deletion vector and a construct using unique_ptr. With this patch we ensure all slaves use the latter approach. |
H A D | dram_ctrl.hh | diff 11190:0964165d1857 Fri Nov 06 03:26:00 EST 2015 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> mem: Unify delayed packet deletion This patch unifies how we deal with delayed packet deletion, where the receiving slave is responsible for deleting the packet, but the sending agent (e.g. a cache) is still relying on the pointer until the call to sendTimingReq completes. Previously we used a mix of a deletion vector and a construct using unique_ptr. With this patch we ensure all slaves use the latter approach. |
H A D | dram_ctrl.cc | diff 11190:0964165d1857 Fri Nov 06 03:26:00 EST 2015 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> mem: Unify delayed packet deletion This patch unifies how we deal with delayed packet deletion, where the receiving slave is responsible for deleting the packet, but the sending agent (e.g. a cache) is still relying on the pointer until the call to sendTimingReq completes. Previously we used a mix of a deletion vector and a construct using unique_ptr. With this patch we ensure all slaves use the latter approach. |
/gem5/src/mem/cache/ | ||
H A D | cache.hh | diff 11190:0964165d1857 Fri Nov 06 03:26:00 EST 2015 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> mem: Unify delayed packet deletion This patch unifies how we deal with delayed packet deletion, where the receiving slave is responsible for deleting the packet, but the sending agent (e.g. a cache) is still relying on the pointer until the call to sendTimingReq completes. Previously we used a mix of a deletion vector and a construct using unique_ptr. With this patch we ensure all slaves use the latter approach. |
H A D | cache.cc | diff 11190:0964165d1857 Fri Nov 06 03:26:00 EST 2015 Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> mem: Unify delayed packet deletion This patch unifies how we deal with delayed packet deletion, where the receiving slave is responsible for deleting the packet, but the sending agent (e.g. a cache) is still relying on the pointer until the call to sendTimingReq completes. Previously we used a mix of a deletion vector and a construct using unique_ptr. With this patch we ensure all slaves use the latter approach. |
Completed in 88 milliseconds