locked_mem.hh (12748:ae5ce8e42de7) | locked_mem.hh (12749:223c83ed9979) |
---|---|
1/* 2 * Copyright (c) 2006 The Regents of The University of Michigan 3 * Copyright (c) 2007-2008 The Florida State University 4 * Copyright (c) 2009 The University of Edinburgh 5 * Copyright (c) 2012 ARM Limited 6 * Copyright (c) 2014-2015 Sven Karlsson 7 * All rights reserved. 8 * --- 68 unchanged lines hidden (view full) --- 77 Addr snoop_addr = pkt->getAddr() & cacheBlockMask; 78 DPRINTF(LLSC, "Locked snoop on address %x.\n", snoop_addr); 79 if ((locked_addrs.top() & cacheBlockMask) == snoop_addr) 80 locked_addrs.pop(); 81} 82 83 84template <class XC> inline void | 1/* 2 * Copyright (c) 2006 The Regents of The University of Michigan 3 * Copyright (c) 2007-2008 The Florida State University 4 * Copyright (c) 2009 The University of Edinburgh 5 * Copyright (c) 2012 ARM Limited 6 * Copyright (c) 2014-2015 Sven Karlsson 7 * All rights reserved. 8 * --- 68 unchanged lines hidden (view full) --- 77 Addr snoop_addr = pkt->getAddr() & cacheBlockMask; 78 DPRINTF(LLSC, "Locked snoop on address %x.\n", snoop_addr); 79 if ((locked_addrs.top() & cacheBlockMask) == snoop_addr) 80 locked_addrs.pop(); 81} 82 83 84template <class XC> inline void |
85handleLockedRead(XC *xc, RequestPtr req) | 85handleLockedRead(XC *xc, const RequestPtr &req) |
86{ 87 locked_addrs.push(req->getPaddr() & ~0xF); 88 DPRINTF(LLSC, "[cid:%d]: Reserved address %x.\n", 89 req->contextId(), req->getPaddr() & ~0xF); 90} 91 92template <class XC> inline void 93handleLockedSnoopHit(XC *xc) 94{} 95 96template <class XC> inline bool | 86{ 87 locked_addrs.push(req->getPaddr() & ~0xF); 88 DPRINTF(LLSC, "[cid:%d]: Reserved address %x.\n", 89 req->contextId(), req->getPaddr() & ~0xF); 90} 91 92template <class XC> inline void 93handleLockedSnoopHit(XC *xc) 94{} 95 96template <class XC> inline bool |
97handleLockedWrite(XC *xc, RequestPtr req, Addr cacheBlockMask) | 97handleLockedWrite(XC *xc, const RequestPtr &req, Addr cacheBlockMask) |
98{ 99 // Normally RISC-V uses zero to indicate success and nonzero to indicate 100 // failure (right now only 1 is reserved), but in gem5 zero indicates 101 // failure and one indicates success, so here we conform to that (it should 102 // be switched in the instruction's implementation) 103 104 DPRINTF(LLSC, "[cid:%d]: locked_addrs empty? %s.\n", req->contextId(), 105 locked_addrs.empty() ? "yes" : "no"); --- 33 unchanged lines hidden --- | 98{ 99 // Normally RISC-V uses zero to indicate success and nonzero to indicate 100 // failure (right now only 1 is reserved), but in gem5 zero indicates 101 // failure and one indicates success, so here we conform to that (it should 102 // be switched in the instruction's implementation) 103 104 DPRINTF(LLSC, "[cid:%d]: locked_addrs empty? %s.\n", req->contextId(), 105 locked_addrs.empty() ? "yes" : "no"); --- 33 unchanged lines hidden --- |