Searched hist:12185 (Results 1 - 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /gem5/src/sim/ | ||
| H A D | root.hh | 12185:90a329add771 Mon Sep 18 20:35:00 EDT 2017 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> sim: Stop using loadState in the Root SimObject. The primary difference between using loadState and letting the default implementation of loadState call unserialize is that whether or not that code is called is dependent on that object being associated with a section in the checkpoint file being unserialized. Since there's always a "root" object, there should always be a section for it in the checkpoint and those should be equivalent. This removes one custom implementation of the loadState function. Change-Id: Ia674ccc18e141f38746e22ccfddc21475b1a0731 Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/4740 Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com> Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com> |
| H A D | root.cc | 12185:90a329add771 Mon Sep 18 20:35:00 EDT 2017 Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> sim: Stop using loadState in the Root SimObject. The primary difference between using loadState and letting the default implementation of loadState call unserialize is that whether or not that code is called is dependent on that object being associated with a section in the checkpoint file being unserialized. Since there's always a "root" object, there should always be a section for it in the checkpoint and those should be equivalent. This removes one custom implementation of the loadState function. Change-Id: Ia674ccc18e141f38746e22ccfddc21475b1a0731 Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/4740 Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com> Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com> |
Completed in 13 milliseconds